Comments on: Obnoxious looking “tuned” DC Tata Nano

By: Alpseee

Alpseee — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:51:30 +0000

Thts the word RON…. ‘Monster’, He seems to be the director of child’s play…

By: Ron Jose

Ron Jose — Wed, 19 May 2010 02:05:14 +0000

I totally agree with you. This ‘tuned’ design is totally ridiculous and senseless. I cannot believe that this is what DC designs can come out with for the Nano. They have taken a cute design and made it into a monstrosity.

By: Alpseee

Alpseee — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:59:48 +0000

The cost of that DC badge would be 95 lakh out of that 1 crore on the price tag. He has created another smaller version of his Imperator (one from his stable) which sucked even more. How many cute looking baby’s is he even gonna molest? I just wanna ask him 1 question, can he prove his cars apart from rich expensive varnishes and some funky fendors and gizmos? Are these cars ‘SAFE’?

By: Alpseee

Alpseee — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:41:36 +0000

Mmmm as i checked on the prior page, this has a 1600 cc motor which does about 200 kmph. In that case what the author says will definitely matter. But I sometimes wonder, whether his aerobics of doing all this crap are even road legal! I mean how could he just add a bigger engine on the same chassis. How many reinforcements will he even give (on the same chassis) its a monocoque skeleton after all. Are his cars primarily tested? If yes then how many times? I don believe he must have even done a crash test on this. Does he even know whats a crumple zone? Its sheer madness and people who adore and follow all this junk are even mad.

By: Rohit Baranwal

Rohit Baranwal — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:32:49 +0000

Well, that is definitely hideous. Looks like DC guys have some set templates which they apply to ‘tune’ each of their releases, whether it really tunes the car for better or worse.